Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KWEB vs MCHI
KWEB vs MCHI Comparison
Open Charts KWEB vs MCHI
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$35.26
Change+$0.76 (+2.20%)
Volume$14.32M
Net Assets7.48B
iShares MSCI China ETF
Price$57.47
Change+$0.95 (+1.68%)
Volume$2.48M
Net Assets6.91B
KWEB vs MCHI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KWEB vs. MCHI commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KWEB is a Hold and MCHI is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 7.48B vs. MCHI (6.91B). MCHI has a higher annual dividend yield than KWEB: MCHI (23.853) vs KWEB (20.588). KWEB was incepted earlier than MCHI: KWEB (12 years) vs MCHI (14 years). MCHI (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than KWEB (0.70). KWEB has a higher turnover MCHI (15.00) vs MCHI (15.00).
| KWEB | MCHI | KWEB / MCHI | |
| Gain YTD | 20.588 | 23.853 | 86% |
| Net Assets | 7.48B | 6.91B | 108% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.59 | 119% |
| Turnover | 54.00 | 15.00 | 360% |
| Yield | 2.90 | 2.48 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| KWEB | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 88% | 13 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | +2.20% | ||
| BABA - KWEB | 89% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| JD - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | +2.30% | ||
| BILI - KWEB | 82% Closely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| WB - KWEB | 80% Closely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| BIDU - KWEB | 80% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
More | ||||
MCHI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHI has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCHI jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHI | 100% | +1.68% | ||
| BABA - MCHI | 87% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| JD - MCHI | 82% Closely correlated | +2.30% | ||
| BILI - MCHI | 81% Closely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| BIDU - MCHI | 77% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| KC - MCHI | 76% Closely correlated | +3.64% | ||
More | ||||