Ad is loading...
KWEB vs PGJ
KWEB vs PGJ Comparison
Open Charts KWEB vs PGJ
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$31.23
Change-$3.32 (-9.61%)
Volume$51.43K
Net Assets8.15B
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
Price$26.43
Change-$2.73 (-9.36%)
Volume$300
Net Assets157.29M
KWEB vs PGJ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KWEB vs. PGJ commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KWEB is a Hold and PGJ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 8.15B vs. PGJ (157M). KWEB has a higher annual dividend yield than PGJ: KWEB (18.194) vs PGJ (11.730). KWEB was incepted earlier than PGJ: KWEB (12 years) vs PGJ (20 years). PGJ (0.67) and KWEB (0.70) have comparable expense ratios . PGJ has a higher turnover KWEB (32.00) vs KWEB (32.00).
| KWEB | PGJ | KWEB / PGJ | |
| Gain YTD | 18.194 | 11.730 | 155% |
| Net Assets | 8.15B | 157M | 5,190% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.67 | 104% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 38.00 | 84% |
| Yield | 2.94 | 4.40 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| KWEB | PGJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 9 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | -1.14% | ||
| BABA - KWEB | 89% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| WB - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | -2.86% | ||
| JD - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| BILI - KWEB | 82% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| BIDU - KWEB | 80% Closely correlated | -2.32% | ||
More | ||||
PGJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGJ has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGJ jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGJ | 100% | -1.82% | ||
| WB - PGJ | 84% Closely correlated | -2.86% | ||
| JD - PGJ | 83% Closely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| BABA - PGJ | 83% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| BEKE - PGJ | 79% Closely correlated | +2.69% | ||
| BILI - PGJ | 78% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
More | ||||