L vs LGLV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a Hold and LGLV is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
L’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- L’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
L’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- L’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.38% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
L is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.13% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
L | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| L | LGLV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 64% | 16 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 71% | 16 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 45% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 46% | 16 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 50% | 16 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 57% | 29 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 45% | 17 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 49% | 16 days ago 75% |
L and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.
LGLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGLV has been closely correlated with NI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LGLV jumps, then NI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LGLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGLV | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| NI - LGLV | 68% Closely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| PLD - LGLV | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| L - LGLV | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.10% | ||
| REXR - LGLV | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| AVY - LGLV | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
More | ||||