It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
L’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
L’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +2.86% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +4.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.07%.
L is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
L | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
L | LGLV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago69% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago87% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago86% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago87% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago86% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGLV has been loosely correlated with PLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGLV jumps, then PLD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LGLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LGLV | 100% | +1.11% | ||
PLD - LGLV | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
L - LGLV | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
REXR - LGLV | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
AVY - LGLV | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
EGP - LGLV | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
More |