It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
L’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMHLD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
L’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MHLD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.33% price change this week, while MHLD (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -9.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +2.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.36%.
L is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.
MHLD is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
L | MHLD | L / MHLD | |
Capitalization | 17.4B | 226M | 7,699% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 4.457 | -28.994 | -15% |
P/E Ratio | 12.32 | 6.22 | 198% |
Revenue | 15.7B | 83.5M | 18,802% |
Total Cash | 45.2B | 244M | 18,525% |
Total Debt | 9B | 255M | 3,531% |
L | MHLD | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 96 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
L's Valuation (69) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as MHLD (82). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to MHLD’s over the last 12 months.
L's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for MHLD (96). This means that L’s stock grew significantly faster than MHLD’s over the last 12 months.
MHLD's SMR Rating (95) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (98). This means that MHLD’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.
L's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as MHLD (40). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to MHLD’s over the last 12 months.
L's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as MHLD (48). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to MHLD’s over the last 12 months.
L | MHLD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago55% | 3 days ago74% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago42% | 3 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 5 days ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago55% | 3 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago55% | 14 days ago70% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago43% | 3 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago56% | 3 days ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago77% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
DISAX | 23.21 | 0.13 | +0.56% |
BNY Mellon International Stock Fund A | |||
FSYKX | 9.29 | 0.05 | +0.54% |
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable EM Eq C | |||
NFJEX | 9.94 | 0.03 | +0.30% |
Virtus NFJ Dividend Value Inst | |||
RWINX | 12.28 | N/A | N/A |
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical Intl N | |||
GSCLX | 26.90 | -0.03 | -0.11% |
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts Svc |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MHLD and BNT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MHLD and BNT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MHLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MHLD | 100% | -4.00% | ||
BNT - MHLD | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.29% | ||
RGA - MHLD | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
KMPR - MHLD | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.88% | ||
AXS - MHLD | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
L - MHLD | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.49% | ||
More |