It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
L’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMKL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
L’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MKL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +2.90% price change this week, while MKL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +3.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.92%.
L is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.
MKL is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
L | MKL | L / MKL | |
Capitalization | 21.4B | 24.7B | 87% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 21.933 | 13.272 | 165% |
P/E Ratio | 16.36 | 11.73 | 139% |
Revenue | 17.8B | 16.3B | 109% |
Total Cash | 6.51B | 10.3B | 63% |
Total Debt | 8.95B | 4.36B | 205% |
L | MKL | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
L's Valuation (71) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as MKL (94) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to MKL’s over the last 12 months.
L's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as MKL (20) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to MKL’s over the last 12 months.
MKL's SMR Rating (94) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (97) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that MKL’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.
L's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as MKL (53) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to MKL’s over the last 12 months.
MKL's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (18) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that MKL’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.
L | MKL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago42% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago40% | 2 days ago53% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 2 days ago54% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 2 days ago57% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 2 days ago51% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 2 days ago49% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago52% | 2 days ago53% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago37% | 14 days ago54% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago40% | 2 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 2 days ago41% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
ZCSH | 13.87 | 3.30 | +31.22% |
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | |||
MMLG | 36.73 | 0.45 | +1.23% |
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Gr ETF | |||
BRW | 7.61 | 0.08 | +1.06% |
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund | |||
PFXF | 18.03 | 0.03 | +0.17% |
VanEck Pref Secs ex Fincls ETF | |||
GJS | 23.00 | N/A | N/A |
Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities STRATS 2006-2 Goldman Sachs Group |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MKL has been closely correlated with THG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MKL jumps, then THG could also see price increases.