L
Price
$93.29
Change
+$0.47 (+0.51%)
Updated
Aug 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.4B
THG
Price
$171.23
Change
-$0.16 (-0.09%)
Updated
Aug 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.88B
85 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

L vs THG

Header iconL vs THG Comparison
Open Charts L vs THGBanner chart's image
Loews
Price$93.29
Change+$0.47 (+0.51%)
Volume$4.48K
Capitalization17.4B
Hanover Insurance Group (The)
Price$171.23
Change-$0.16 (-0.09%)
Volume$500
Capitalization4.88B
L vs THG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
THG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. THG commentary
Aug 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a Buy and THG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 06, 2025
Stock price -- (L: $93.30 vs. THG: $171.18)
Brand notoriety: L and THG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 77% vs. THG: 67%
Market capitalization -- L: $17.4B vs. THG: $4.88B
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $17.4B. THG’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $4.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTHG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • THG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than THG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while THG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • THG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both L and THG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +2.39% price change this week, while THG (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +2.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

THG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.57% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($17.4B) has a higher market cap than THG($4.88B). THG has higher P/E ratio than L: THG (143.99) vs L (12.32). THG YTD gains are higher at: 12.007 vs. L (10.325). L has more cash in the bank: 45.2B vs. THG (3.27B). THG has less debt than L: THG (783M) vs L (9B). L has higher revenues than THG: L (15.7B) vs THG (5.96B).
LTHGL / THG
Capitalization17.4B4.88B357%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.32512.00786%
P/E Ratio12.32143.999%
Revenue15.7B5.96B263%
Total Cash45.2B3.27B1,382%
Total Debt9B783M1,150%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs THG: Fundamental Ratings
L
THG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7814
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
620
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5248
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2690
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

L's Valuation (50) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as THG (50). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to THG’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as THG (20). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to THG’s over the last 12 months.

L's SMR Rating (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as THG (100). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to THG’s over the last 12 months.

THG's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (52). This means that THG’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for THG (90). This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than THG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LTHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
THG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IAE7.010.04
+0.57%
VOYA ASIA PACIFIC HIGH DIVIDEND EQUITY Income FUND
TYO13.340.04
+0.26%
Direxion Daily 7-10 Yr Trs Bear 3X ETF
MINO43.970.02
+0.05%
PIMCO Muncpl Income Oppos Act Ex-Trd
CGSD25.95-0.01
-0.04%
Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
GCAL49.74-0.05
-0.10%
Goldman Sachs Dynamic CA Muncpl Inc ETF

THG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, THG has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if THG jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To THG
1D Price
Change %
THG100%
+1.52%
L - THG
78%
Closely correlated
+2.80%
HIG - THG
77%
Closely correlated
+2.63%
CINF - THG
76%
Closely correlated
+2.43%
KMPR - THG
76%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
MKL - THG
69%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
More