L
Price
$82.76
Change
-$0.22 (-0.27%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
17.4B
71 days until earnings call
WTM
Price
$1830.01
Change
-$27.70 (-1.49%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
4.52B
73 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

L vs WTM

Header iconL vs WTM Comparison
Open Charts L vs WTMBanner chart's image
Loews
Price$82.76
Change-$0.22 (-0.27%)
Volume$916.72K
Capitalization17.4B
White Mountains Insurance Group
Price$1830.01
Change-$27.70 (-1.49%)
Volume$9.35K
Capitalization4.52B
L vs WTM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. WTM commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a Hold and WTM is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (L: $82.76 vs. WTM: $1830.01)
Brand notoriety: L and WTM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 117% vs. WTM: 67%
Market capitalization -- L: $17.4B vs. WTM: $4.52B
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $17.4B. WTM’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $4.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWTM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WTM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both L and WTM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WTM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than WTM.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.30% price change this week, while WTM (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +0.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2025.

WTM is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.68% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($17.4B) has a higher market cap than WTM($4.52B). L has higher P/E ratio than WTM: L (12.32) vs WTM (8.91). L YTD gains are higher at: -2.279 vs. WTM (-5.915). L has more cash in the bank: 45.2B vs. WTM (1.61B). WTM has less debt than L: WTM (565M) vs L (9B). L has higher revenues than WTM: L (15.7B) vs WTM (2.17B).
LWTML / WTM
Capitalization17.4B4.52B385%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.279-5.91539%
P/E Ratio12.328.91138%
Revenue15.7B2.17B725%
Total Cash45.2B1.61B2,807%
Total Debt9B565M1,593%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs WTM: Fundamental Ratings
L
WTM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6337
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2620
SMR RATING
1..100
9887
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
406
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

L's Valuation (68) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WTM (78). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to WTM’s over the last 12 months.

WTM's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (26). This means that WTM’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

WTM's SMR Rating (87) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (98). This means that WTM’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WTM (57). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to WTM’s over the last 12 months.

WTM's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for L (40). This means that WTM’s stock grew somewhat faster than L’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWTM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UUP29.080.10
+0.35%
Invesco DB US Dollar Bullish
XTWO49.190.09
+0.17%
BondBloxx Bloomberg Two YrTrgDurUSTrsETF
HFND22.30-0.20
-0.88%
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strgy Ret Trckr ETF
ACIO40.70-0.56
-1.36%
Aptus Collared Investment Opp ETF
ODDS28.60-0.51
-1.75%
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF

WTM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTM has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTM jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTM
1D Price
Change %
WTM100%
-1.49%
L - WTM
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
CINF - WTM
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
MKL - WTM
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
HIG - WTM
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
HMN - WTM
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
More