Ad is loading...
L
Price
$85.17
Change
+$0.68 (+0.80%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
80 days until earnings call
WTM
Price
$1971.32
Change
+$26.33 (+1.35%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
75 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

L vs WTM

Header iconL vs WTM Comparison
Open Charts L vs WTMBanner chart's image
Loews
Price$85.17
Change+$0.68 (+0.80%)
Volume$1.06M
CapitalizationN/A
White Mountains Insurance Group
Price$1971.32
Change+$26.33 (+1.35%)
Volume$7.41K
CapitalizationN/A
L vs WTM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. WTM commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a StrongBuy and WTM is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (L: $85.17 vs. WTM: $1971.32)
Brand notoriety: L and WTM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 132% vs. WTM: 64%
Market capitalization -- L: $17.4B vs. WTM: $4.52B
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $17.4B. WTM’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $4.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWTM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WTM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than WTM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • WTM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than WTM.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +2.86% price change this week, while WTM (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +2.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +3.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2025.

WTM is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+3.87% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($17.4B) has a higher market cap than WTM($4.52B). L has higher P/E ratio than WTM: L (12.32) vs WTM (8.91). WTM YTD gains are higher at: 31.058 vs. L (22.692). L has more cash in the bank: 45.2B vs. WTM (1.61B). WTM has less debt than L: WTM (565M) vs L (9B). L has higher revenues than WTM: L (15.7B) vs WTM (2.17B).
LWTML / WTM
Capitalization17.4B4.52B385%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.69231.05873%
P/E Ratio12.328.91138%
Revenue15.7B2.17B725%
Total Cash45.2B1.61B2,807%
Total Debt9B565M1,593%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs WTM: Fundamental Ratings
L
WTM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1813
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2314
SMR RATING
1..100
9887
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3245
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5594
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

L's Valuation (68) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WTM (75). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to WTM’s over the last 12 months.

WTM's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (23). This means that WTM’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

WTM's SMR Rating (87) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (98). This means that WTM’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WTM (45). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to WTM’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTM (94). This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWTM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVIE56.430.20
+0.35%
Calvert International Responsible ETF
FTLS65.590.22
+0.34%
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
FDHY48.890.03
+0.06%
Fidelity Enhanced High Yield ETF
USML42.10N/A
N/A
ETRACS 2x Lvrgd MSCI US Mn Vl Fct TR ETN
INC27.67N/A
N/A
VanEck Dynamic High Income ETF

WTM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTM has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTM jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTM
1D Price
Change %
WTM100%
+1.35%
L - WTM
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
RLI - WTM
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
SAFT - WTM
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
CINF - WTM
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.13%
AFG - WTM
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
More