Ad is loading...
LABFX vs RLBEX
LABFX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts LABFX vs RLBEX
Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opp A
Price$12.13
Change+$0.05 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.88B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$33.93
Change+$0.08 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets231.33B
LABFX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LABFX vs. RLBEX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LABFX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 231B vs. LABFX (1.88B). LABFX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: LABFX (2.56) vs RLBEX (1.97). LABFX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: LABFX (30 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). LABFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. LABFX (31.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LABFX: RLBEX (250) vs LABFX (1500). LABFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. RLBEX (4.61). LABFX (35.89) and RLBEX (35.08) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LABFX | RLBEX | LABFX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.59 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.59 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.981 | -0.688 | 143% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.88B | 231B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 1.97 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.52 | 4.61 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.80 | 18.06 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.89 | 35.08 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.32 | 50.69 | 64% |