Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LABYX vs RLBCX
LABYX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts LABYX vs RLBCX
Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opp I
Price$13.25
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$37.91
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.13B
LABYX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LABYX vs. RLBCX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LABYX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 260B vs. LABYX (2.03B). LABYX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: LABYX (2.70) vs RLBCX (1.53). LABYX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: LABYX (21 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). LABYX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. LABYX (31.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LABYX: RLBCX (250) vs LABYX (1000000). LABYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.58 vs. RLBCX (10.64). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.15 vs. LABYX (31.57).
| LABYX | RLBCX | LABYX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.89 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.89 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.928 | 11.658 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 260B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 1.53 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.58 | 10.64 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.04 | 36.13 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.57 | 40.15 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.48 | 73.35 | 85% |