LAC
Price
$2.96
Change
+$0.07 (+2.42%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
714.16M
LILIF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
8.73M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAC vs LILIF

Header iconLAC vs LILIF Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs LILIFBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$2.96
Change+$0.07 (+2.42%)
Volume$39.74K
Capitalization714.16M
Argentina Lithium & Energy
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.6K
Capitalization8.73M
LAC vs LILIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LILIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAC vs. LILIF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a Hold and LILIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (LAC: $2.89 vs. LILIF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: LAC and LILIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 69% vs. LILIF: 2%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $714.16M vs. LILIF: $7.77M
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $714.16M. LILIF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $7.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLILIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LILIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LAC and LILIF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LILIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LILIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAC is a better buy in the short-term than LILIF.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.34% price change this week, while LILIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +146.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.50% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAC($714M) has a higher market cap than LILIF($8.73M). LAC YTD gains are higher at: -2.694 vs. LILIF (-23.750). LILIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -23.34M vs. LAC (-53.54M). LAC has more cash in the bank: 509M vs. LILIF (358K). LILIF has less debt than LAC: LILIF (1.45M) vs LAC (207M). LAC (0) and LILIF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LACLILIFLAC / LILIF
Capitalization714M8.73M8,183%
EBITDA-53.54M-23.34M229%
Gain YTD-2.694-23.75011%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash509M358K142,179%
Total Debt207M1.45M14,246%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC vs LILIF: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
LILIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9496
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LILIF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (34). This means that LILIF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

LILIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (100). This means that LILIF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

LAC's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as LILIF (96). This means that LAC’s stock grew similarly to LILIF’s over the last 12 months.

LILIF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (49). This means that LILIF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

LILIF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (100). This means that LILIF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACLILIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LILIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCCVX14.040.05
+0.36%
AB Small Cap Value C
VYSDX11.140.02
+0.18%
Voya Small Company R
PMDDX19.430.01
+0.05%
Principal Small-MidCap Dividend Inc C
ALPBX12.87N/A
N/A
ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity I
CLWFX84.98-0.13
-0.15%
Columbia Cornerstone Growth Inst 2

LILIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LILIF and SBWFF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LILIF and SBWFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LILIF
1D Price
Change %
LILIF100%
+2.01%
SBWFF - LILIF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTSRF - LILIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
LLKKF - LILIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+10.70%
MALRY - LILIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
LAC - LILIF
14%
Poorly correlated
+3.58%
More