LAC
Price
$7.37
Change
+$1.36 (+22.63%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.79B
LTMCF
Price
$0.34
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
70.22M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAC vs LTMCF

Header iconLAC vs LTMCF Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs LTMCFBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$7.37
Change+$1.36 (+22.63%)
Volume$212.86M
Capitalization1.79B
Lithium Chile
Price$0.34
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$160.06K
Capitalization70.22M
LAC vs LTMCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LTMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAC vs. LTMCF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a Buy and LTMCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LAC: $7.37 vs. LTMCF: $0.34)
Brand notoriety: LAC and LTMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 1101% vs. LTMCF: 938%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $1.79B vs. LTMCF: $70.22M
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.79B. LTMCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $70.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLTMCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LTMCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LAC is a better buy in the long-term than LTMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LTMCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LTMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAC is a better buy in the short-term than LTMCF.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +128.88% price change this week, while LTMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAC($1.8B) has a higher market cap than LTMCF($70.2M). LAC YTD gains are higher at: 148.148 vs. LTMCF (-37.833). LTMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.93M vs. LAC (-53.54M). LAC has more cash in the bank: 509M vs. LTMCF (448K). LAC (0) and LTMCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LACLTMCFLAC / LTMCF
Capitalization1.8B70.2M2,557%
EBITDA-53.54M-2.93M1,830%
Gain YTD148.148-37.833-392%
P/E RatioN/A46.78-
Revenue00-
Total Cash509M448K113,616%
Total Debt207MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC vs LTMCF: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
LTMCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
313
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10089
SMR RATING
1..100
9488
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3591
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10015
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LAC's Valuation (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LTMCF (79). This means that LAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

LTMCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (100). This means that LTMCF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

LTMCF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (94). This means that LTMCF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

LAC's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LTMCF (91). This means that LAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

LTMCF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LAC (100). This means that LTMCF’s stock grew significantly faster than LAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACLTMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LTMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BDST0.460.01
+2.22%
bebe stores, inc.
FLNCF0.15N/A
N/A
Freelancer Limited
HISEF3.30N/A
N/A
Hisense Kelon Electrical Holdings Co Ltd.
SWSDF1042.00N/A
N/A
Swiss Life Holding
MNSAF2.94-0.05
-1.61%
Mineros S.A.

LAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAC has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAC jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAC
1D Price
Change %
LAC100%
+22.63%
LAR - LAC
53%
Loosely correlated
+11.63%
SLI - LAC
49%
Loosely correlated
+9.25%
BHP - LAC
45%
Loosely correlated
+4.09%
VALE - LAC
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
RIO - LAC
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.44%
More

LTMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LTMCF and LAC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTMCF and LAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTMCF
1D Price
Change %
LTMCF100%
-0.13%
LAC - LTMCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+22.63%
PMETF - LTMCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
MP - LTMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+8.28%
ERMAY - LTMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLCNF - LTMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
More