LAC
Price
$2.89
Change
+$0.10 (+3.58%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
702.51M
LTMCF
Price
$0.42
Change
-$0.01 (-2.33%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
88.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAC vs LTMCF

Header iconLAC vs LTMCF Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs LTMCFBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$2.89
Change+$0.10 (+3.58%)
Volume$5.93M
Capitalization702.51M
Lithium Chile
Price$0.42
Change-$0.01 (-2.33%)
Volume$37.01K
Capitalization88.45M
LAC vs LTMCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LTMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAC vs. LTMCF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a Hold and LTMCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LAC: $2.89 vs. LTMCF: $0.42)
Brand notoriety: LAC and LTMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 69% vs. LTMCF: 309%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $702.51M vs. LTMCF: $88.45M
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $702.51M. LTMCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $88.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLTMCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LTMCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LTMCF is a better buy in the long-term than LAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LTMCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LTMCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAC is a better buy in the short-term than LTMCF.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.34% price change this week, while LTMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -3.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAC($703M) has a higher market cap than LTMCF($88.4M). LAC YTD gains are higher at: -2.694 vs. LTMCF (-21.898). LTMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.02M vs. LAC (-53.54M). LAC has more cash in the bank: 509M vs. LTMCF (1.07M). LAC (0) and LTMCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LACLTMCFLAC / LTMCF
Capitalization703M88.4M795%
EBITDA-53.54M-3.02M1,774%
Gain YTD-2.694-21.89812%
P/E RatioN/A58.58-
Revenue00-
Total Cash509M1.07M47,659%
Total Debt207MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC vs LTMCF: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
LTMCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10072
SMR RATING
1..100
9464
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5358
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10011
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LAC's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LTMCF (83). This means that LAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

LTMCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (100). This means that LTMCF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

LTMCF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (94). This means that LTMCF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

LAC's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as LTMCF (58). This means that LAC’s stock grew similarly to LTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

LTMCF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LAC (100). This means that LTMCF’s stock grew significantly faster than LAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACLTMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LTMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UCBJY121.291.90
+1.59%
UCB S.A.
RAFA0.09N/A
N/A
Rafarma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (WY)
TPGVF0.16N/A
N/A
Top Glove Corp.
VLVCY4.14N/A
N/A
VOLVO CAR AB
NNOMF0.74-0.02
-3.11%
Nano One Materials Corp.

LTMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LTMCF and LAC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTMCF and LAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTMCF
1D Price
Change %
LTMCF100%
-1.30%
LAC - LTMCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.58%
PMETF - LTMCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
MP - LTMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
ERMAY - LTMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLCNF - LTMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
More