LAC
Price
$2.29
Change
-$0.11 (-4.58%)
Updated
Sep 20 closing price
LZM
Price
$6.56
Change
-$0.34 (-4.93%)
Updated
Sep 20 closing price
67 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LAC vs LZM

Header iconLAC vs LZM Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs LZMBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$2.29
Change-$0.11 (-4.58%)
Volume$2.64M
CapitalizationN/A
Lifezone Metals
Price$6.56
Change-$0.34 (-4.93%)
Volume$306.38K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
LAC vs LZM Comparison Chart
Loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
LAC vs. LZM commentary
Sep 21, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a Sell and LZM is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 21, 2024
Stock price -- (LAC: $2.29 vs. LZM: $6.56)
Brand notoriety: LAC and LZM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 81% vs. LZM: 249%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $1.14B vs. LZM: $627.96M
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.14B. LZM’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $627.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LAC is a better buy in the long-term than LZM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LZM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LZM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAC is a better buy in the short-term than LZM.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -4.18% price change this week, while LZM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2023.

LZM is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.47% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAC($1.14B) has a higher market cap than LZM($628M). LZM YTD gains are higher at: -27.434 vs. LAC (-64.219). LAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.27M vs. LZM (-32.95M). LAC has more cash in the bank: 196M vs. LZM (44.4M). LZM has less debt than LAC: LZM (496K) vs LAC (3.11M). LZM has higher revenues than LAC: LZM (2.32M) vs LAC (0).
LACLZMLAC / LZM
Capitalization1.14B628M182%
EBITDA-3.27M-32.95M10%
Gain YTD-64.219-27.434234%
P/E RatioN/A1250.00-
Revenue02.32M-
Total Cash196M44.4M441%
Total Debt3.11M496K628%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACLZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARRBX15.02N/A
N/A
Aristotle Small Cap Eq R6
TWQIX14.97-0.02
-0.13%
Transamerica Large Cap Value I
PEIJX43.25-0.12
-0.28%
Principal Equity Income J
HEMZX7.25-0.02
-0.28%
Virtus SGA Emerging Markets Equity A
MLMIX20.58-0.11
-0.53%
Morgan Stanley Instl Global Core I

LAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAC has been loosely correlated with PLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAC jumps, then PLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAC
1D Price
Change %
LAC100%
-4.58%
PLL - LAC
54%
Loosely correlated
-4.88%
MP - LAC
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
SGML - LAC
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
FCX - LAC
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
MTRN - LAC
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.83%
More

LZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LZM and MTAL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LZM and MTAL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LZM
1D Price
Change %
LZM100%
-4.93%
MTAL - LZM
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.57%
URG - LZM
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VZLA - LZM
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
IE - LZM
16%
Poorly correlated
-5.00%
LAC - LZM
13%
Poorly correlated
-4.58%
More