LAC
Price
$2.89
Change
+$0.10 (+3.58%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
702.51M
NILIF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
34.96M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAC vs NILIF

Header iconLAC vs NILIF Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs NILIFBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$2.89
Change+$0.10 (+3.58%)
Volume$5.93M
Capitalization702.51M
Surge Battery Metals
Price$0.19
Change-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Volume$21.54K
Capitalization34.96M
LAC vs NILIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NILIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAC vs. NILIF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a Hold and NILIF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LAC: $2.89 vs. NILIF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: LAC and NILIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 69% vs. NILIF: 31%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $702.51M vs. NILIF: $34.96M
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $702.51M. NILIF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $34.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNILIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NILIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LAC and NILIF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NILIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NILIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LAC and NILIF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.34% price change this week, while NILIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAC($703M) has a higher market cap than NILIF($35M). LAC YTD gains are higher at: -2.694 vs. NILIF (-23.820). NILIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.5M vs. LAC (-53.54M). LAC has more cash in the bank: 509M vs. NILIF (777K). LAC (0) and NILIF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LACNILIFLAC / NILIF
Capitalization703M35M2,009%
EBITDA-53.54M-6.5M824%
Gain YTD-2.694-23.82011%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash509M777K65,508%
Total Debt207MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC vs NILIF: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
NILIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1711
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10089
SMR RATING
1..100
9498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5361
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LAC's Valuation (34) in the null industry is in the same range as NILIF (47). This means that LAC’s stock grew similarly to NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

NILIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (100). This means that NILIF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

LAC's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as NILIF (98). This means that LAC’s stock grew similarly to NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

LAC's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as NILIF (61). This means that LAC’s stock grew similarly to NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

LAC's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NILIF (100). This means that LAC’s stock grew similarly to NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACNILIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NILIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DEMIX26.660.31
+1.18%
Macquarie Emerging Markets Instl
STSCX42.86N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital SmCp Val Instl
GLPSX38.24N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras R6
GEMPX13.56N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Emerging Mkts Eq ex. Chn P
ARAFX11.93N/A
N/A
Aristotle International Eq A

NILIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NILIF has been loosely correlated with PLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NILIF jumps, then PLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NILIF
1D Price
Change %
NILIF100%
-1.64%
PLL - NILIF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LAC - NILIF
33%
Poorly correlated
+3.58%
BDNNY - NILIF
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
PMETF - NILIF
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
SGML - NILIF
32%
Poorly correlated
+6.46%
More