LAC
Price
$2.89
Change
+$0.10 (+3.58%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
702.51M
NTMFF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
13.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAC vs NTMFF

Header iconLAC vs NTMFF Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs NTMFFBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$2.89
Change+$0.10 (+3.58%)
Volume$5.93M
Capitalization702.51M
NEOTECH METALS
Price$0.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$56.43K
Capitalization13.31M
LAC vs NTMFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAC vs. NTMFF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a Hold and NTMFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LAC: $2.89 vs. NTMFF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: LAC and NTMFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 69% vs. NTMFF: 138%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $702.51M vs. NTMFF: $13.31M
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $702.51M. NTMFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $13.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTMFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NTMFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTMFF is a better buy in the long-term than LAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTMFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NTMFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAC is a better buy in the short-term than NTMFF.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.34% price change this week, while NTMFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAC($703M) has a higher market cap than NTMFF($13.3M). NTMFF YTD gains are higher at: 138.502 vs. LAC (-2.694). NTMFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.06M vs. LAC (-53.54M). LAC has more cash in the bank: 509M vs. NTMFF (493K). LAC (0) and NTMFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LACNTMFFLAC / NTMFF
Capitalization703M13.3M5,286%
EBITDA-53.54M-2.06M2,598%
Gain YTD-2.694138.502-2%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash509M493K103,245%
Total Debt207MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACNTMFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DEMIX26.660.31
+1.18%
Macquarie Emerging Markets Instl
STSCX42.86N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital SmCp Val Instl
GLPSX38.24N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras R6
GEMPX13.56N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Emerging Mkts Eq ex. Chn P
ARAFX11.93N/A
N/A
Aristotle International Eq A

NTMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTMFF and ABAT have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTMFF and ABAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTMFF
1D Price
Change %
NTMFF100%
+0.90%
ABAT - NTMFF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.38%
VMXXF - NTMFF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTWOF - NTMFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLIDF - NTMFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LAC - NTMFF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+3.58%
More