LAC
Price
$2.96
Change
+$0.10 (+3.51%)
Updated
Aug 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
648.37M
NVA
Price
$11.40
Change
-$0.77 (-6.33%)
Updated
Aug 13, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
85.04M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAC vs NVA

Header iconLAC vs NVA Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs NVABanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$2.96
Change+$0.10 (+3.51%)
Volume$47.18K
Capitalization648.37M
Nova Minerals
Price$11.40
Change-$0.77 (-6.33%)
Volume$2.4K
Capitalization85.04M
LAC vs NVA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAC vs. NVA commentary
Aug 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a Hold and NVA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2025
Stock price -- (LAC: $2.85 vs. NVA: $12.17)
Brand notoriety: LAC and NVA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 137% vs. NVA: 174%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $648.37M vs. NVA: $85.04M
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $648.37M. NVA’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $85.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNVA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LAC and NVA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NVA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LAC and NVA are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +8.37% price change this week, while NVA (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -0.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +104.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAC($648M) has a higher market cap than NVA($85M). LAC YTD gains are higher at: -4.040 vs. NVA (-12.003).
LACNVALAC / NVA
Capitalization648M85M762%
EBITDA-46.84MN/A-
Gain YTD-4.040-12.00334%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash447MN/A-
Total Debt21.2MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACNVA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALCBX12.61N/A
N/A
ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity C
MIPIX16.22N/A
N/A
Matthews Asia Dividend Instl
WFEDX14.50N/A
N/A
Allspring International Equity Admin
CIPNX21.29N/A
N/A
Champlain Small Company Institutional
ATHGX29.69N/A
N/A
American Century Heritage R5

NVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NVA and BHP have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NVA and BHP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVA
1D Price
Change %
NVA100%
-2.64%
BHP - NVA
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
BLTH - NVA
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LAC - NVA
12%
Poorly correlated
-6.56%
ALM - NVA
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.73%
LZM - NVA
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
More