LAC
Price
$6.33
Change
-$1.05 (-14.25%)
Updated
Sep 26, 01:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.79B
PMETF
Price
$3.02
Change
+$0.06 (+2.03%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
495.93M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAC vs PMETF

Header iconLAC vs PMETF Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs PMETFBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$6.33
Change-$1.05 (-14.25%)
Volume$37.82K
Capitalization1.79B
PMET Resources
Price$3.02
Change+$0.06 (+2.03%)
Volume$19.11K
Capitalization495.93M
LAC vs PMETF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMETF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAC vs. PMETF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a Buy and PMETF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LAC: $7.37 vs. PMETF: $3.02)
Brand notoriety: LAC and PMETF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 1101% vs. PMETF: 66%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $1.79B vs. PMETF: $495.93M
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.79B. PMETF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $495.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePMETF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PMETF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LAC is a better buy in the long-term than PMETF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMETF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PMETF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAC is a better buy in the short-term than PMETF.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +128.88% price change this week, while PMETF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +18.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +270.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.96% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAC($1.8B) has a higher market cap than PMETF($496M). LAC YTD gains are higher at: 148.148 vs. PMETF (23.416). PMETF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.7M vs. LAC (-53.54M). LAC has more cash in the bank: 509M vs. PMETF (82.8M). PMETF has less debt than LAC: PMETF (349K) vs LAC (207M). LAC (0) and PMETF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LACPMETFLAC / PMETF
Capitalization1.8B496M362%
EBITDA-53.54M8.7M-616%
Gain YTD148.14823.416633%
P/E RatioN/A635.27-
Revenue00-
Total Cash509M82.8M615%
Total Debt207M349K59,312%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC vs PMETF: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
PMETF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
318
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10081
SMR RATING
1..100
9492
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3539
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10072
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LAC's Valuation (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMETF (96). This means that LAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMETF’s over the last 12 months.

PMETF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (100). This means that PMETF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

PMETF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (94). This means that PMETF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

LAC's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PMETF (39). This means that LAC’s stock grew similarly to PMETF’s over the last 12 months.

PMETF's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (100). This means that PMETF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACPMETF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMETF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRGRX60.43N/A
N/A
MFS Core Equity I
OBSOX28.09N/A
N/A
Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities
RMBGX37.54N/A
N/A
RMB I
REACX26.12N/A
N/A
American Century Real Estate Inv
DHIYX20.97N/A
N/A
Diamond Hill International Y

LAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAC has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAC jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAC
1D Price
Change %
LAC100%
+22.63%
LAR - LAC
53%
Loosely correlated
+11.63%
SLI - LAC
49%
Loosely correlated
+9.25%
BHP - LAC
45%
Loosely correlated
+4.09%
VALE - LAC
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
RIO - LAC
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.44%
More

PMETF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMETF has been loosely correlated with PILBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMETF jumps, then PILBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMETF
1D Price
Change %
PMETF100%
+2.17%
PILBF - PMETF
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
LAC - PMETF
42%
Loosely correlated
+22.63%
BHP - PMETF
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.09%
RIO - PMETF
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.44%
SGML - PMETF
41%
Loosely correlated
+9.92%
More