LAC
Price
$2.89
Change
+$0.10 (+3.58%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
701.39M
QQREF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAC vs QQREF

Header iconLAC vs QQREF Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs QQREFBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$2.89
Change+$0.10 (+3.58%)
Volume$5.93M
Capitalization701.39M
Quebec Rare Earth Elements
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization2.55M
LAC vs QQREF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QQREF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAC vs. QQREF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a Hold and QQREF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (LAC: $2.89 vs. QQREF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: LAC and QQREF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 69% vs. QQREF: 26%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $701.39M vs. QQREF: $2.55M
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $701.39M. QQREF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQQREF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QQREF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LAC and QQREF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QQREF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QQREF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAC is a better buy in the short-term than QQREF.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.34% price change this week, while QQREF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -20.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAC($701M) has a higher market cap than QQREF($2.55M). QQREF YTD gains are higher at: 34.560 vs. LAC (-2.694). QQREF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -652.1K vs. LAC (-53.54M). LAC has more cash in the bank: 509M vs. QQREF (626K). QQREF has less debt than LAC: QQREF (12K) vs LAC (207M). LAC (0) and QQREF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LACQQREFLAC / QQREF
Capitalization701M2.55M27,490%
EBITDA-53.54M-652.1K8,211%
Gain YTD-2.69434.560-8%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash509M626K81,310%
Total Debt207M12K1,725,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC vs QQREF: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
QQREF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9494
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a35

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QQREF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (34). This means that QQREF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

QQREF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (100). This means that QQREF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

QQREF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (94). This means that QQREF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

QQREF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (49). This means that QQREF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

QQREF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (100). This means that QQREF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACQQREF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QQREF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCCVX14.040.05
+0.36%
AB Small Cap Value C
VYSDX11.140.02
+0.18%
Voya Small Company R
PMDDX19.430.01
+0.05%
Principal Small-MidCap Dividend Inc C
ALPBX12.87N/A
N/A
ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity I
CLWFX84.98-0.13
-0.15%
Columbia Cornerstone Growth Inst 2

LAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAC has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAC jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAC
1D Price
Change %
LAC100%
+3.58%
LAR - LAC
65%
Loosely correlated
+6.01%
SGML - LAC
52%
Loosely correlated
+6.46%
SLI - LAC
47%
Loosely correlated
+6.97%
TECK - LAC
47%
Loosely correlated
+4.70%
BHP - LAC
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More

QQREF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QQREF and LILIF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QQREF and LILIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QQREF
1D Price
Change %
QQREF100%
N/A
LILIF - QQREF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.01%
RNGE - QQREF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.80%
FLMCF - QQREF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LAC - QQREF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+3.58%
NTMFF - QQREF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
More