LAC
Price
$2.29
Change
-$0.11 (-4.58%)
Updated
Sep 20 closing price
SGML
Price
$11.41
Change
+$0.07 (+0.62%)
Updated
Sep 20 closing price
54 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LAC vs SGML

Header iconLAC vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs SGMLBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$2.29
Change-$0.11 (-4.58%)
Volume$2.64M
CapitalizationN/A
Sigma Lithium
Price$11.41
Change+$0.07 (+0.62%)
Volume$711.88K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
LAC vs SGML Comparison Chart
Loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SGML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
LAC vs. SGML commentary
Sep 21, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a Sell and SGML is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 21, 2024
Stock price -- (LAC: $2.29 vs. SGML: $11.41)
Brand notoriety: LAC and SGML are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 81% vs. SGML: 59%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $1.14B vs. SGML: $1.54B
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.14B. SGML’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSGML’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SGML’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGML is a better buy in the long-term than LAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGML’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SGML’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGML is a better buy in the short-term than LAC.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -4.18% price change this week, while SGML (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +10.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2023.

SGML is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.47% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGML($1.54B) has a higher market cap than LAC($1.14B). SGML (-63.812) and LAC (-64.219) have similar YTD gains . LAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.27M vs. SGML (-82.05M). LAC has more cash in the bank: 196M vs. SGML (38.1M). LAC has less debt than SGML: LAC (3.11M) vs SGML (157M). SGML has higher revenues than LAC: SGML (130M) vs LAC (0).
LACSGMLLAC / SGML
Capitalization1.14B1.54B74%
EBITDA-3.27M-82.05M4%
Gain YTD-64.219-63.812101%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0130M-
Total Cash196M38.1M514%
Total Debt3.11M157M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC vs SGML: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
SGML
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
913
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10070
SMR RATING
1..100
9080
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9062
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10047
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LAC's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGML (86). This means that LAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGML’s over the last 12 months.

SGML's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (100). This means that SGML’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

SGML's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (90). This means that SGML’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

SGML's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (90). This means that SGML’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

SGML's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAC (100). This means that SGML’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACSGML
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SGML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAEAX21.50N/A
N/A
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr A
JDCRX47.03N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Forty R
CRFRX11.90N/A
N/A
Calvert Focused Value R6
RAPRX10.66N/A
N/A
Cohen & Steers Real Assets R
TFCCX19.20-0.19
-0.98%
Touchstone Large Cap C

SGML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with PLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then PLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGML
1D Price
Change %
SGML100%
+0.62%
PLL - SGML
48%
Loosely correlated
-4.88%
BHP - SGML
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.54%
RIO - SGML
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.47%
MP - SGML
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
HBM - SGML
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
More