Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LACAX vs PMBJX
LACAX vs PMBJX Comparison
Open Charts LACAX vs PMBJX
LACAX vs PMBJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LACAX vs. PMBJX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LACAX is a Hold and PMBJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBJX has more cash in the bank: 33.1B vs. LACAX (2.56B). PMBJX pays higher dividends than LACAX: PMBJX (0.06) vs LACAX (0.00). LACAX was incepted earlier than PMBJX: LACAX (25 years) vs PMBJX (25 years). LACAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than PMBJX (0.78). LACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. PMBJX (10.50). PMBJX has a lower initial minimum investment than LACAX: PMBJX (1000) vs LACAX (2000). LACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.05 vs. PMBJX (4.12). PMBJX return over 5 years is better than : 39.19 vs. LACAX (-29.42).
| LACAX | PMBJX | LACAX / PMBJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.78 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.78 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.795 | 5.464 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.56B | 33.1B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.05 | 4.12 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 54.19 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.42 | 39.19 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | -68.75 | 105.33 | -65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers