Ad is loading...
LACAX vs PMBPX
LACAX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts LACAX vs PMBPX
LACAX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LACAX vs. PMBPX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LACAX is a Hold and PMBPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 29.6B vs. LACAX (2.56B). LACAX (0.00) and PMBPX (0.00) have matching dividends . LACAX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: LACAX (24 years) vs PMBPX (24 years). LACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBPX (10.10). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than LACAX: PMBPX (0) vs LACAX (2000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.43 vs. LACAX (4.74). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 35.10 vs. LACAX (-31.98).
| LACAX | PMBPX | LACAX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.444 | 1.864 | -238% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.56B | 29.6B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.74 | 12.43 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.11 | 27.85 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.98 | 35.10 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | -73.65 | 92.30 | -80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...