Ad is loading...
LACAX vs PMBPX
LACAX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts LACAX vs PMBPX
LACAX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LACAX vs. PMBPX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LACAX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. LACAX (2.22B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than LACAX: PMBPX (0.01) vs LACAX (0.00). LACAX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: LACAX (25 years) vs PMBPX (24 years). LACAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.84). LACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than LACAX: PMBPX (0) vs LACAX (2000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.57 vs. LACAX (-5.73). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 70.47 vs. LACAX (-28.33).
| LACAX | PMBPX | LACAX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.84 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.84 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.322 | -1.634 | 938% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 29.3B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.73 | 8.57 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.70 | 26.98 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.33 | 70.47 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | -76.88 | 84.90 | -91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers