Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LACAX vs PMBPX
LACAX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts LACAX vs PMBPX
LACAX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LACAX vs. PMBPX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LACAX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 31.3B vs. LACAX (2.43B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than LACAX: PMBPX (0.01) vs LACAX (0.00). LACAX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: LACAX (25 years) vs PMBPX (24 years). LACAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). LACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than LACAX: PMBPX (0) vs LACAX (2000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.21 vs. LACAX (-0.38). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 67.13 vs. LACAX (-28.84).
| LACAX | PMBPX | LACAX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.83 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.83 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.784 | 4.441 | -153% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.43B | 31.3B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.38 | 10.21 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.68 | 45.73 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.84 | 67.13 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | -75.26 | 94.81 | -79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers