LAD
Price
$336.68
Change
-$1.83 (-0.54%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
8.63B
45 days until earnings call
RUSHA
Price
$57.40
Change
-$0.49 (-0.85%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
4.48B
58 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAD vs RUSHA

Header iconLAD vs RUSHA Comparison
Open Charts LAD vs RUSHABanner chart's image
Lithia Motors
Price$336.68
Change-$1.83 (-0.54%)
Volume$353.44K
Capitalization8.63B
Rush Enterprises
Price$57.40
Change-$0.49 (-0.85%)
Volume$230.99K
Capitalization4.48B
LAD vs RUSHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAD vs. RUSHA commentary
Aug 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAD is a StrongBuy and RUSHA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 31, 2025
Stock price -- (LAD: $336.68 vs. RUSHA: $57.40)
Brand notoriety: LAD and RUSHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAD: 110% vs. RUSHA: 57%
Market capitalization -- LAD: $8.63B vs. RUSHA: $4.48B
LAD [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $8.63B. RUSHA’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $4.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $51.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LAD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the long-term than LAD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAD is a better buy in the short-term than RUSHA.

Price Growth

LAD (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +3.05% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -2.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAD is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.35% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAD($8.63B) has a higher market cap than RUSHA($4.48B). RUSHA has higher P/E ratio than LAD: RUSHA (16.35) vs LAD (9.99). RUSHA YTD gains are higher at: 5.848 vs. LAD (-5.296). LAD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.37B vs. RUSHA (682M). LAD has more cash in the bank: 404M vs. RUSHA (211M). RUSHA has less debt than LAD: RUSHA (1.75B) vs LAD (14.3B). LAD has higher revenues than RUSHA: LAD (37.2B) vs RUSHA (7.69B).
LADRUSHALAD / RUSHA
Capitalization8.63B4.48B193%
EBITDA2.37B682M347%
Gain YTD-5.2965.848-91%
P/E Ratio9.9916.3561%
Revenue37.2B7.69B484%
Total Cash404M211M191%
Total Debt14.3B1.75B815%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAD vs RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
LAD
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1882
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6617
SMR RATING
1..100
5856
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4749
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4732
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUSHA's Valuation (34) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as LAD (42) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to LAD’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAD (66) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAD’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's SMR Rating (56) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as LAD (58) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to LAD’s over the last 12 months.

LAD's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (49) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that LAD’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as LAD (47) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to LAD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LADRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASICX26.300.01
+0.04%
Invesco Asia Pacific Equity C
TGVIX32.60-0.13
-0.40%
Thornburg International Equity I
PDAIX12.45-0.05
-0.40%
PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allc Instl
ICAFX65.43-0.43
-0.65%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer F2
GTILX29.33-0.31
-1.05%
Glenmede Disciplined USGrEqPtf InstlShrs

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
-0.85%
RUSHB - RUSHA
85%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
AN - RUSHA
71%
Closely correlated
-1.47%
ABG - RUSHA
68%
Closely correlated
-2.52%
GPI - RUSHA
68%
Closely correlated
-2.70%
PAG - RUSHA
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
More