LAD
Price
$370.77
Change
-$10.20 (-2.68%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
56 days until earnings call
RUSHA
Price
$59.25
Change
+$0.61 (+1.04%)
Updated
Dec 18, 10:56 AM (EDT)
56 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LAD vs RUSHA

Header iconLAD vs RUSHA Comparison
Open Charts LAD vs RUSHABanner chart's image
Lithia Motors
Price$370.77
Change-$10.20 (-2.68%)
Volume$396.48K
CapitalizationN/A
Rush Enterprises
Price$59.25
Change+$0.61 (+1.04%)
Volume$778
CapitalizationN/A
LAD vs RUSHA Comparison Chart
Loading...
LAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAD vs. RUSHA commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAD is a Hold and RUSHA is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (LAD: $370.77 vs. RUSHA: $58.64)
Brand notoriety: LAD and RUSHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAD: 136% vs. RUSHA: 78%
Market capitalization -- LAD: $8.28B vs. RUSHA: $4.12B
LAD [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $8.28B. RUSHA’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $4.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LAD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the long-term than LAD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the short-term than LAD.

Price Growth

LAD (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -1.53% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Specialty Stores) price change was -3.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAD is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.02% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAD($8.28B) has a higher market cap than RUSHA($4.12B). RUSHA has higher P/E ratio than LAD: RUSHA (12.75) vs LAD (8.15). RUSHA YTD gains are higher at: 18.203 vs. LAD (13.397). LAD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.98B vs. RUSHA (737M). LAD has more cash in the bank: 941M vs. RUSHA (184M). RUSHA has less debt than LAD: RUSHA (1.81B) vs LAD (11.3B). LAD has higher revenues than RUSHA: LAD (31B) vs RUSHA (7.93B).
LADRUSHALAD / RUSHA
Capitalization8.28B4.12B201%
EBITDA1.98B737M269%
Gain YTD13.39718.20374%
P/E Ratio8.1512.7564%
Revenue31B7.93B391%
Total Cash941M184M511%
Total Debt11.3B1.81B625%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAD vs RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
LAD
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7265
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
345
SMR RATING
1..100
6055
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1419
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUSHA's Valuation (28) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAD (64) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAD’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as LAD (34) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to LAD’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's SMR Rating (55) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as LAD (60) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to LAD’s over the last 12 months.

LAD's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (42) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that LAD’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

LAD's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (19) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that LAD’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LADRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APRQ24.90N/A
N/A
Innovator Premium Income 40 Bar ETF -Apr
BALT31.49N/A
-0.02%
Innovator Defined Wealth Shld ETF
DSEP40.99-0.04
-0.10%
FT Vest US Equity Dp Bffr ETF Sep
BETZ19.93-0.03
-0.15%
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
IWO301.73-3.48
-1.14%
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF

LAD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAD has been closely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAD jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAD
1D Price
Change %
LAD100%
-2.68%
PAG - LAD
74%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
ABG - LAD
72%
Closely correlated
-1.70%
AN - LAD
70%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
SAH - LAD
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
RUSHA - LAD
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
More

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
-2.62%
RUSHB - RUSHA
90%
Closely correlated
-1.96%
LAD - RUSHA
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.68%
PAG - RUSHA
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
ABG - RUSHA
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.70%
AN - RUSHA
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
More