Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADCX vs WCMLX
LADCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADCX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth C
Price$9.79
Change+$0.15 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.40
Change+$0.16 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.48M
LADCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADCX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADCX has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. WCMLX (41.5M). LADCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADCX (29 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LADCX (1.69). LADCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADCX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). LADCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.90 vs. WCMLX (-0.65). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.28 vs. LADCX (-23.97).
| LADCX | WCMLX | LADCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.99 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.79 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.696 | -4.821 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 41.5M | 4,600% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.90 | -0.65 | -754% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.35 | 17.69 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.97 | 22.28 | -108% |
| Returns for 10 years | -48.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement