Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADCX vs WCMLX
LADCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADCX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth C
Price$10.23
Change+$0.05 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.97B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.92
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.74M
LADCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADCX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADCX has more cash in the bank: 1.97B vs. WCMLX (43.7M). LADCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADCX (29 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LADCX (1.69). LADCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADCX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). LADCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.42 vs. WCMLX (7.56). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 15.42 vs. LADCX (-29.35).
| LADCX | WCMLX | LADCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.99 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.79 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.698 | 0.700 | 243% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.97B | 43.7M | 4,508% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.42 | 7.56 | 230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.42 | 11.25 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.35 | 15.42 | -190% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement