Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADCX vs WCMLX
LADCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADCX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth C
Price$11.30
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.09B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.90
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.16M
LADCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADCX has more cash in the bank: 2.09B vs. WCMLX (44.2M). LADCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADCX (29 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LADCX (1.69). LADCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADCX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). LADCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.66 vs. WCMLX (6.19). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 21.82 vs. LADCX (-25.95).
| LADCX | WCMLX | LADCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.99 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.79 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.887 | 8.087 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.09B | 44.2M | 4,722% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.66 | 6.19 | 253% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.82 | 31.13 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.95 | 21.82 | -119% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.33 | N/A | - |