Ad is loading...
LADCX vs WCMLX
LADCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADCX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth C
Price$8.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.68B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.81
Change+$0.10 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.8M
LADCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADCX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADCX has more cash in the bank: 1.68B vs. WCMLX (38.8M). LADCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADCX (29 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LADCX (1.69). LADCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). LADCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADCX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). LADCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.17 vs. WCMLX (-12.36). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 23.25 vs. LADCX (-22.13).
| LADCX | WCMLX | LADCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.99 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.86 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.481 | -16.719 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.68B | 38.8M | 4,327% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.17 | -12.36 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.72 | -8.07 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.13 | 23.25 | -95% |
| Returns for 10 years | -57.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...