Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADCX vs WCMNX
LADCX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts LADCX vs WCMNX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth C
Price$10.99
Change+$0.14 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.96
Change+$0.07 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
LADCX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADCX vs. WCMNX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADCX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADCX has more cash in the bank: 1.92B vs. WCMNX (41.3M). LADCX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADCX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: LADCX (29 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than LADCX (1.69). LADCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). LADCX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LADCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.63 vs. WCMNX (-3.30). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -2.13 vs. LADCX (-36.40).
| LADCX | WCMNX | LADCX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.24 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 2.04 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.392 | 1.576 | 532% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 41.3M | 4,659% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.63 | -3.30 | -140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.79 | 20.47 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.40 | -2.13 | 1,712% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement