Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADFX vs NRGSX
LADFX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts LADFX vs NRGSX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
Price$27.54
Change-$0.22 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$62.80
Change+$0.25 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.68B
LADFX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADFX vs. NRGSX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADFX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.69B vs. LADFX (2.03B). LADFX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: LADFX (0.12) vs NRGSX (0.06). LADFX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: LADFX (18 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). LADFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). LADFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). LADFX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LADFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.89 vs. NRGSX (-10.41). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -2.71 vs. LADFX (-10.43).
| LADFX | NRGSX | LADFX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.74 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.74 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.145 | -4.285 | -330% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 8.69B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.06 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.89 | -10.41 | -114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.47 | 6.99 | 736% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.43 | -2.71 | 385% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.14 | 9.65 | 292% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement