Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADFX vs NRGSX
LADFX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts LADFX vs NRGSX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
Price$26.57
Change-$0.07 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.39
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.2B
LADFX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADFX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADFX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.2B vs. LADFX (1.93B). LADFX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: LADFX (0.11) vs NRGSX (0.07). LADFX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: LADFX (18 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). LADFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). LADFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). LADFX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LADFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.09 vs. NRGSX (-14.54). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -10.73 vs. LADFX (-15.96).
| LADFX | NRGSX | LADFX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.74 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.74 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.539 | -7.544 | -126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 8.2B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.07 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.09 | -14.54 | -63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.72 | -4.05 | -981% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.96 | -10.73 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.95 | 3.75 | 639% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers