Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADFX vs WCMLX
LADFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADFX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
Price$25.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.18
Change-$0.08 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.37M
LADFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADFX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADFX has more cash in the bank: 2.01B vs. WCMLX (44.4M). LADFX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LADFX (0.13) vs WCMLX (0.00). LADFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADFX (18 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LADFX (0.79). LADFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADFX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.93 vs. WCMLX (3.76). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 18.18 vs. LADFX (-3.53).
| LADFX | WCMLX | LADFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.79 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.222 | 3.110 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 44.4M | 4,536% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.93 | 3.76 | 318% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.95 | 10.04 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.53 | 18.18 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.05 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers