Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADFX vs WCMLX
LADFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADFX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
Price$26.23
Change+$0.37 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.58
Change+$0.21 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.98M
LADFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADFX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADFX has more cash in the bank: 2.04B vs. WCMLX (45M). LADFX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LADFX (0.12) vs WCMLX (0.00). LADFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADFX (18 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LADFX (0.79). LADFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADFX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.98 vs. WCMLX (6.59). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 20.93 vs. LADFX (1.24).
| LADFX | WCMLX | LADFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.79 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.854 | 5.599 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 45M | 4,536% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.98 | 6.59 | 258% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.43 | 28.23 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.24 | 20.93 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers