Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADFX vs WCMLX
LADFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADFX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
Price$27.54
Change-$0.22 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.83
Change-$0.18 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.69M
LADFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADFX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADFX has more cash in the bank: 2.03B vs. WCMLX (43.7M). LADFX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LADFX (0.12) vs WCMLX (0.00). LADFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADFX (18 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LADFX (0.79). LADFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADFX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.89 vs. WCMLX (3.17). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 14.27 vs. LADFX (-10.43).
| LADFX | WCMLX | LADFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.79 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.145 | 8.942 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 43.7M | 4,654% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.89 | 3.17 | 376% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.47 | 38.17 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.43 | 14.27 | -73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement