Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADFX vs WCMLX
LADFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADFX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
Price$23.84
Change+$0.36 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.74
Change+$0.12 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.98M
LADFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADFX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADFX has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. WCMLX (43M). LADFX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LADFX (0.14) vs WCMLX (0.00). LADFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADFX (18 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LADFX (0.79). LADFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADFX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.34 vs. WCMLX (2.91). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 21.91 vs. LADFX (-3.40).
| LADFX | WCMLX | LADFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.79 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.974 | -0.933 | 212% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 43M | 4,477% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.34 | 2.91 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.94 | 26.01 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.40 | 21.91 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement