Ad is loading...
LADFX vs WCMLX
LADFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADFX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
Price$19.38
Change-$1.17 (-5.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.78B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.81
Change-$0.86 (-7.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.58M
LADFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADFX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADFX has more cash in the bank: 1.78B vs. WCMLX (41.6M). LADFX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LADFX (0.16) vs WCMLX (0.00). LADFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADFX (18 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LADFX (0.79). LADFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). LADFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADFX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.26 vs. WCMLX (-9.95). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 62.99 vs. LADFX (28.52).
| LADFX | WCMLX | LADFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.86 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.502 | -9.253 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.78B | 41.6M | 4,269% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.26 | -9.95 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.04 | -6.42 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.52 | 62.99 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...