Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADFX vs WCMLX
LADFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADFX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
Price$24.13
Change+$0.28 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.10
Change+$0.15 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.18M
LADFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADFX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADFX has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. WCMLX (44.2M). LADFX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LADFX (0.14) vs WCMLX (0.00). LADFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADFX (18 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LADFX (0.79). LADFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADFX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. WCMLX (1.39). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 24.41 vs. LADFX (-3.97).
| LADFX | WCMLX | LADFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.79 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.781 | 1.866 | -42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 44.2M | 4,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | 1.39 | 581% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.76 | 23.35 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.97 | 24.41 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement