Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADFX vs WCMLX
LADFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADFX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
Price$22.77
Change-$0.22 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.87B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.97
Change-$0.22 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.71M
LADFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADFX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADFX has more cash in the bank: 1.87B vs. WCMLX (40.7M). LADFX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LADFX (0.15) vs WCMLX (0.00). LADFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADFX (18 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LADFX (0.79). LADFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADFX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.91 vs. WCMLX (-3.31). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 20.79 vs. LADFX (1.28).
| LADFX | WCMLX | LADFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.79 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.373 | -6.921 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 40.7M | 4,600% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.91 | -3.31 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.22 | 24.69 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.28 | 20.79 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.05 | N/A | - |