Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADFX vs WCMNX
LADFX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts LADFX vs WCMNX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
Price$22.77
Change-$0.22 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.87B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$11.80
Change-$0.22 (-1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.71M
LADFX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADFX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADFX is a Hold and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADFX has more cash in the bank: 1.87B vs. WCMNX (40.7M). LADFX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: LADFX (0.15) vs WCMNX (0.00). LADFX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: LADFX (18 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than LADFX (0.79). LADFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). LADFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: LADFX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). LADFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.91 vs. WCMNX (-3.59). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 19.31 vs. LADFX (1.28).
| LADFX | WCMNX | LADFX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.24 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 2.04 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.373 | -7.013 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 40.7M | 4,600% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.91 | -3.59 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.22 | 23.69 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.28 | 19.31 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.05 | N/A | - |