Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADFX vs WCMNX
LADFX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts LADFX vs WCMNX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
Price$26.23
Change+$0.37 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.51
Change+$0.12 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.58M
LADFX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADFX vs. WCMNX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADFX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADFX has more cash in the bank: 2.04B vs. WCMNX (44.6M). LADFX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: LADFX (0.12) vs WCMNX (0.00). LADFX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: LADFX (18 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than LADFX (0.79). LADFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). LADFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: LADFX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). LADFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.98 vs. WCMNX (6.35). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 19.45 vs. LADFX (1.24).
| LADFX | WCMNX | LADFX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.24 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 2.04 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.854 | 5.516 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 44.6M | 4,576% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.98 | 6.35 | 267% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.43 | 27.40 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.24 | 19.45 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement