Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADFX vs WCMNX
LADFX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts LADFX vs WCMNX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
Price$27.54
Change-$0.22 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.62
Change-$0.18 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.69M
LADFX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADFX vs. WCMNX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADFX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADFX has more cash in the bank: 2.03B vs. WCMNX (43.7M). LADFX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: LADFX (0.12) vs WCMNX (0.00). LADFX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: LADFX (18 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than LADFX (0.79). LADFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). LADFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: LADFX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). LADFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.89 vs. WCMNX (2.91). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 12.84 vs. LADFX (-10.43).
| LADFX | WCMNX | LADFX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.24 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 2.04 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.145 | 8.747 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 43.7M | 4,654% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.89 | 2.91 | 409% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.47 | 37.18 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.43 | 12.84 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement