Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADFX vs WCMNX
LADFX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts LADFX vs WCMNX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
Price$21.70
Change-$0.54 (-2.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.85B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$11.76
Change-$0.36 (-2.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.65M
LADFX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADFX vs. WCMNX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADFX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADFX has more cash in the bank: 1.85B vs. WCMNX (43.7M). LADFX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: LADFX (0.16) vs WCMNX (0.00). LADFX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: LADFX (18 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than LADFX (0.79). LADFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). LADFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: LADFX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). LADFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.86 vs. WCMNX (-3.19). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 20.72 vs. LADFX (-2.29).
| LADFX | WCMNX | LADFX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.24 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 2.04 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.553 | -4.492 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.85B | 43.7M | 4,243% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.86 | -3.19 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.70 | 18.59 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.29 | 20.72 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement