Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADFX vs WCMNX
LADFX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts LADFX vs WCMNX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
Price$24.13
Change+$0.28 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.92
Change+$0.15 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.18M
LADFX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADFX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADFX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADFX has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. WCMNX (44.2M). LADFX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: LADFX (0.14) vs WCMNX (0.00). LADFX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: LADFX (18 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than LADFX (0.79). LADFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). LADFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: LADFX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). LADFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. WCMNX (1.17). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 22.93 vs. LADFX (-3.97).
| LADFX | WCMNX | LADFX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.24 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 2.04 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.781 | 1.812 | -43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 44.2M | 4,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | 1.17 | 689% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.76 | 22.58 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.97 | 22.93 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers