Ad is loading...
LADPX vs WCMLX
LADPX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADPX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth P
Price$18.24
Change+$0.08 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.80
Change+$0.13 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.14M
LADPX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADPX vs. WCMLX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADPX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADPX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. WCMLX (42.1M). LADPX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADPX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADPX (27 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LADPX (1.14). LADPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADPX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.99 vs. WCMLX (-6.86). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 21.31 vs. LADPX (-6.87).
| LADPX | WCMLX | LADPX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.99 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.86 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.228 | -9.253 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 42.1M | 4,292% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.99 | -6.86 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.23 | 15.89 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.87 | 21.31 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...