Ad is loading...
LADPX vs WCMLX
LADPX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADPX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth P
Price$15.51
Change-$0.96 (-5.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.31
Change-$0.50 (-4.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.73M
LADPX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADPX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADPX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADPX has more cash in the bank: 1.57B vs. WCMLX (36.7M). LADPX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADPX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADPX (27 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LADPX (1.14). LADPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). LADPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADPX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -15.84 vs. WCMLX (-19.39). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 43.99 vs. LADPX (8.92).
| LADPX | WCMLX | LADPX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.99 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.86 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -25.036 | -19.829 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.57B | 36.7M | 4,281% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.84 | -19.39 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.63 | -15.56 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.92 | 43.99 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.65 | N/A | - |