Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADPX vs WCMLX
LADPX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADPX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth P
Price$20.49
Change+$0.24 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.10
Change+$0.15 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.18M
LADPX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADPX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADPX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADPX has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. WCMLX (44.2M). LADPX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADPX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADPX (28 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LADPX (1.14). LADPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADPX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.73 vs. WCMLX (1.39). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 24.41 vs. LADPX (-8.36).
| LADPX | WCMLX | LADPX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.99 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.79 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.967 | 1.866 | -52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 44.2M | 4,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.73 | 1.39 | 555% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.47 | 23.35 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.36 | 24.41 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement