Ad is loading...
LADQX vs WCMLX
LADQX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADQX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R2
Price$16.71
Change+$0.43 (+2.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.28
Change+$0.27 (+2.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.35M
LADQX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADQX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADQX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADQX has more cash in the bank: 1.7B vs. WCMLX (39.3M). LADQX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADQX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADQX (18 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LADQX (1.29). LADQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). LADQX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADQX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.07 vs. WCMLX (-10.85). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 25.40 vs. LADQX (-4.74).
| LADQX | WCMLX | LADQX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.99 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.86 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.944 | -14.386 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.7B | 39.3M | 4,333% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.07 | -10.85 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.86 | -5.33 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.74 | 25.40 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | -29.89 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...