Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADQX vs WCMLX
LADQX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADQX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R2
Price$18.90
Change+$0.27 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.89B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.31
Change+$0.13 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.98M
LADQX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADQX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADQX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADQX has more cash in the bank: 1.89B vs. WCMLX (43M). LADQX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADQX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADQX (18 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LADQX (1.29). LADQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADQX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADQX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.02 vs. WCMLX (-1.22). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 13.83 vs. LADQX (-7.54).
| LADQX | WCMLX | LADQX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.99 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.79 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.099 | -5.288 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.89B | 43M | 4,391% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.02 | -1.22 | -330% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.03 | 10.63 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.54 | 13.83 | -55% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement