Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADQX vs WCMLX
LADQX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADQX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R2
Price$19.45
Change+$0.30 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.40
Change+$0.16 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.48M
LADQX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADQX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADQX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADQX has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. WCMLX (41.5M). LADQX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADQX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADQX (18 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LADQX (1.29). LADQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADQX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADQX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.28 vs. WCMLX (-0.65). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.28 vs. LADQX (-6.63).
| LADQX | WCMLX | LADQX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.99 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.79 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.478 | -4.821 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 41.5M | 4,600% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.28 | -0.65 | -813% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.82 | 17.69 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.63 | 22.28 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement