Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADRX vs NRGSX
LADRX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts LADRX vs NRGSX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R3
Price$23.53
Change-$0.23 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$63.09
Change-$0.69 (-1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.89B
LADRX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADRX vs. NRGSX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADRX is a Buy and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.9B vs. LADRX (2.11B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than LADRX: NRGSX (0.06) vs LADRX (0.00). LADRX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: LADRX (18 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). LADRX (1.19) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). LADRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). LADRX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LADRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.93 vs. NRGSX (-5.89). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : 0.66 vs. LADRX (-11.64).
| LADRX | NRGSX | LADRX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.74 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.74 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.727 | -2.402 | -613% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 8.9B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.93 | -5.89 | -288% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.09 | 10.52 | 476% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.64 | 0.66 | -1,751% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.95 | 11.35 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement