Ad is loading...
LADRX vs WCMLX
LADRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADRX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R3
Price$18.26
Change+$0.08 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.80
Change+$0.13 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.14M
LADRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADRX vs. WCMLX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADRX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADRX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. WCMLX (42.1M). LADRX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADRX (18 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LADRX (1.19). LADRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADRX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.04 vs. WCMLX (-6.86). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 21.31 vs. LADRX (-7.06).
| LADRX | WCMLX | LADRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.99 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.86 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.216 | -9.253 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 42.1M | 4,292% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.04 | -6.86 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.05 | 15.89 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.06 | 21.31 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.09 | N/A | - |