Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADSX vs NRGSX
LADSX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts LADSX vs NRGSX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R4
Price$24.71
Change-$0.20 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$63.00
Change-$0.38 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.89B
LADSX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADSX vs. NRGSX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADSX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.89B vs. LADSX (2.07B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than LADSX: NRGSX (0.06) vs LADSX (0.00). LADSX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: LADSX (10 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). LADSX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). LADSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). LADSX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LADSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.77 vs. NRGSX (-6.44). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : 7.59 vs. LADSX (-3.37).
| LADSX | NRGSX | LADSX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.74 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.74 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.205 | -3.015 | -372% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 8.89B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.77 | -6.44 | -198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.88 | 12.25 | 415% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.37 | 7.59 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.83 | 17.49 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers