Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADSX vs NRGSX
LADSX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts LADSX vs NRGSX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R4
Price$24.78
Change+$0.33 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.19B
LADSX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADSX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADSX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. LADSX (1.92B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than LADSX: NRGSX (0.07) vs LADSX (0.00). LADSX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: LADSX (10 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). LADSX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). LADSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). LADSX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LADSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.43 vs. NRGSX (-14.62). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -11.01 vs. LADSX (-18.77).
| LADSX | NRGSX | LADSX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.74 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.74 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.152 | -7.590 | -121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 8.19B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.43 | -14.62 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.76 | -4.10 | -946% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.77 | -11.01 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.93 | 3.70 | 458% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement