Ad is loading...
LADSX vs WCMLX
LADSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADSX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R4
Price$18.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.68B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.81
Change+$0.10 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.8M
LADSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADSX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADSX has more cash in the bank: 1.68B vs. WCMLX (38.8M). LADSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADSX (10 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LADSX (0.94). LADSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). LADSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADSX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.49 vs. WCMLX (-12.36). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 23.25 vs. LADSX (-0.44).
| LADSX | WCMLX | LADSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.99 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.86 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.241 | -16.719 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.68B | 38.8M | 4,327% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.49 | -12.36 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.73 | -8.07 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.44 | 23.25 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...