Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADTX vs NRGSX
LADTX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts LADTX vs NRGSX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R5
Price$32.52
Change+$0.56 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.9B
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$61.59
Change+$1.70 (+2.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.28B
LADTX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADTX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADTX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.28B vs. LADTX (1.9B). LADTX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: LADTX (0.17) vs NRGSX (0.07). LADTX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: LADTX (10 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). NRGSX (0.74) is less costly to investors than LADTX (0.69). LADTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). LADTX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LADTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.49 vs. NRGSX (-17.07). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -11.74 vs. LADTX (-14.77).
| LADTX | NRGSX | LADTX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.74 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.74 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.046 | -8.355 | -96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.9B | 8.28B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.07 | 263% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.49 | -17.07 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.90 | -5.64 | -673% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.77 | -11.74 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.28 | 2.20 | 2,106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement