Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADVX vs NRGSX
LADVX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts LADVX vs NRGSX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R6
Price$33.28
Change+$0.45 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.19B
LADVX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADVX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADVX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. LADVX (1.92B). LADVX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: LADVX (0.17) vs NRGSX (0.07). LADVX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: LADVX (10 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). NRGSX (0.74) is less costly to investors than LADVX (0.59). LADVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). LADVX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LADVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.79 vs. NRGSX (-14.62). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -11.01 vs. LADVX (-13.17).
| LADVX | NRGSX | LADVX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.74 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.74 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.470 | -7.590 | -125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 8.19B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.07 | 258% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.79 | -14.62 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.20 | -4.10 | -982% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.17 | -11.01 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.67 | 3.70 | 1,073% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement