Ad is loading...
LAFAX vs RERCX
LAFAX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFAX vs RERCX
Columbia Acorn International Sel A
Price$25.47
Change+$0.13 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets190.12M
American Funds Europacific Growth R3
Price$53.21
Change+$0.17 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets127.3B
LAFAX vs RERCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFAX vs. RERCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFAX is a Buy and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 127B vs. LAFAX (190M). RERCX pays higher dividends than LAFAX: RERCX (1.29) vs LAFAX (0.00). LAFAX was incepted earlier than RERCX: LAFAX (24 years) vs RERCX (23 years). LAFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RERCX (34.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFAX: RERCX (250) vs LAFAX (2000). LAFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.67 vs. RERCX (3.48). RERCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.93 vs. LAFAX (-11.10).
| LAFAX | RERCX | LAFAX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.152 | 2.013 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 190M | 127B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.29 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.67 | 3.48 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.02 | -9.43 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.10 | -0.93 | 1,192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.36 | 18.39 | 89% |