Ad is loading...
LAFCX vs VIVAX
LAFCX vs VIVAX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs VIVAX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$17.91
Change+$0.31 (+1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.53B
Vanguard Value Index I
Price$63.21
Change+$0.94 (+1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets190.51B
LAFCX vs VIVAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. VIVAX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Buy and VIVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIVAX has more cash in the bank: 191B vs. LAFCX (5.54B). VIVAX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: VIVAX (2.14) vs LAFCX (0.85). LAFCX was incepted earlier than VIVAX: LAFCX (29 years) vs VIVAX (32 years). LAFCX (1.45) is less costly to investors than VIVAX (0.17). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. VIVAX (10.00). LAFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIVAX: LAFCX (1000) vs VIVAX (3000). VIVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.72 vs. LAFCX (-2.98). VIVAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.30 vs. LAFCX (45.70).
| LAFCX | VIVAX | LAFCX / VIVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.17 | 853% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.17 | 853% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.078 | -5.712 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.54B | 191B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 2.14 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.98 | 0.72 | -416% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.06 | 8.14 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.70 | 64.30 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.40 | 88.68 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers