Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFFX vs RMFCX
LAFFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated A
Price$20.71
Change+$0.08 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.34B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.51
Change+$0.17 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
LAFFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFFX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFFX (6.34B). LAFFX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFFX (1.35) vs RMFCX (1.20). LAFFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFFX (76 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFFX (0.69). LAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFFX: RMFCX (250) vs LAFFX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. LAFFX (4.51). RMFCX (57.10) and LAFFX (55.42) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFFX | RMFCX | LAFFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 76 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.153 | 13.689 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.34B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.20 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.51 | 4.96 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.13 | 38.79 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.42 | 57.10 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.82 | 91.18 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement