Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFFX vs RMFCX
LAFFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated A
Price$20.60
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
LAFFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFFX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAFFX (6.24B). LAFFX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFFX (1.36) vs RMFCX (1.21). LAFFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFFX (76 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFFX (0.69). LAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFFX: RMFCX (250) vs LAFFX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. LAFFX (2.78). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. LAFFX (48.61).
| LAFFX | RMFCX | LAFFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 76 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.179 | 12.783 | 87% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 110B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.21 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.78 | 6.00 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.97 | 27.94 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.61 | 52.67 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.25 | 84.73 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement