Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFFX vs RMFEX
LAFFX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFFX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated A
Price$19.21
Change-$0.20 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.01B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.86
Change-$0.45 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
LAFFX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFFX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFFX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LAFFX (6.01B). LAFFX (1.59) and RMFEX (1.58) have matching dividends . LAFFX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFFX (76 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFFX: RMFEX (250) vs LAFFX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.03 vs. LAFFX (7.28). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 62.32 vs. LAFFX (55.92).
| LAFFX | RMFEX | LAFFX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 76 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.441 | 6.152 | 56% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.01B | 106B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.58 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.28 | 9.03 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.91 | 29.63 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.92 | 62.32 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.00 | 76.27 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement