Ad is loading...
LAFFX vs RMFEX
LAFFX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFFX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated A
Price$18.69
Change+$0.33 (+1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.79B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$55.81
Change+$0.82 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.26B
LAFFX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFFX vs. RMFEX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFFX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 100B vs. LAFFX (5.79B). LAFFX (1.65) and RMFEX (1.65) have matching dividends . LAFFX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFFX (75 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFFX: RMFEX (250) vs LAFFX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.69 vs. LAFFX (5.43). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 62.96 vs. LAFFX (59.31).
| LAFFX | RMFEX | LAFFX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 75 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.136 | 2.013 | -56% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.79B | 100B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 1.65 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.43 | 8.69 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.87 | 16.77 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.31 | 62.96 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.88 | 68.72 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...