Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFFX vs RMFEX
LAFFX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFFX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated A
Price$20.17
Change-$0.10 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.46
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
LAFFX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFFX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFFX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAFFX (6.24B). RMFEX (1.51) and LAFFX (1.45) have matching dividends . LAFFX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFFX (76 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFFX: RMFEX (250) vs LAFFX (1000). LAFFX (8.36) and RMFEX (8.10) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.34 vs. LAFFX (53.24).
| LAFFX | RMFEX | LAFFX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 76 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.935 | 10.922 | 82% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 110B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.51 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.36 | 8.10 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.26 | 23.84 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.24 | 57.34 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.59 | 86.04 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement