Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFGX vs REEBX
LAFGX vs REEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFGX vs REEBX
Lord Abbett International Growth F
Price$16.25
Change-$0.11 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.62M
American Funds EUPAC R2E
Price$59.89
Change-$0.32 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.33B
LAFGX vs REEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REEBX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. LAFGX (3.63M). REEBX pays higher dividends than LAFGX: REEBX (0.43) vs LAFGX (0.32). LAFGX was incepted earlier than REEBX: LAFGX (4 years) vs REEBX (11 years). LAFGX (9.22) is less costly to investors than REEBX (1.27). LAFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. REEBX (35.00). LAFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than REEBX: LAFGX (0) vs REEBX (250). LAFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.80 vs. REEBX (8.92).
| LAFGX | REEBX | LAFGX / REEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.27 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 9.22 | 1.27 | 726% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.379 | 13.536 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.63M | 134B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.43 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.80 | 8.92 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.72 | 19.71 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 8.32 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 25.60 | - |