Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFLX vs RMFCX
LAFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value A
Price$13.74
Change+$0.12 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.09M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
LAFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LAFLX (36.1M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFLX: RMFCX (1.31) vs LAFLX (0.65). LAFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFLX: RMFCX (250) vs LAFLX (1500). LAFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.72 vs. RMFCX (9.01). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.66 vs. LAFLX (-1.13).
| LAFLX | RMFCX | LAFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.91 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.049 | 5.919 | 68% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.1M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.31 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.72 | 9.01 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.76 | 17.82 | -44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.13 | 51.66 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement