Ad is loading...
LAFLX vs RMFCX
LAFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value A
Price$12.36
Change+$0.08 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.28M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
LAFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. LAFLX (32.3M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFLX: RMFCX (1.34) vs LAFLX (0.68). LAFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAFLX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFLX: RMFCX (250) vs LAFLX (1500). LAFLX (3.68) and RMFCX (3.60) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.78 vs. LAFLX (17.20).
| LAFLX | RMFCX | LAFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.91 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.188 | -3.342 | 185% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.3M | 96.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.34 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.68 | 3.60 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.05 | 5.79 | -295% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.20 | 48.78 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers