Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFLX vs RMFCX
LAFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value A
Price$15.09
Change-$0.07 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net AssetsN/A
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.20
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LAFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFLX: RMFCX (1.24) vs LAFLX (0.60). LAFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFLX: RMFCX (250) vs LAFLX (1500). LAFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.46 vs. RMFCX (6.75). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.84 vs. LAFLX (13.01).
| LAFLX | RMFCX | LAFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.91 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.814 | 12.804 | 124% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | N/A | 111B | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.24 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.46 | 6.75 | 258% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.63 | 33.93 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.01 | 58.84 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement