Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFLX vs RWMHX
LAFLX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LAFLX vs RWMHX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value A
Price$15.27
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.16M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$67.39
Change+$0.12 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.01B
LAFLX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFLX vs. RWMHX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFLX is a Buy and RWMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. LAFLX (68.2M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than LAFLX: RWMHX (1.33) vs LAFLX (0.58). LAFLX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LAFLX (6 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). LAFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LAFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFLX: RWMHX (250) vs LAFLX (1500). LAFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.24 vs. RWMHX (6.37). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 53.96 vs. LAFLX (14.19).
| LAFLX | RWMHX | LAFLX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.41 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.41 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.425 | 10.898 | 151% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.2M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.33 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.24 | 6.37 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.44 | 45.89 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.19 | 53.96 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement