Ad is loading...
LAFPX vs RMFCX
LAFPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFPX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated P
Price$17.74
Change+$0.31 (+1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.53B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.96
Change+$0.76 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
LAFPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFPX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. LAFPX (5.54B). LAFPX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFPX (1.43) vs RMFCX (1.34). LAFPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFPX (27 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) and LAFPX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . LAFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. LAFPX (-2.48). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.32 vs. LAFPX (47.97).
| LAFPX | RMFCX | LAFPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.91 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.91 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.990 | -2.681 | 223% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.54B | 95.8B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.34 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.48 | 1.87 | -132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.18 | 6.27 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.97 | 53.32 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.37 | 54.78 | 35% |