Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFPX vs RMFCX
LAFPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFPX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated P
Price$19.17
Change-$0.19 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.07B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.6B
LAFPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFPX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. LAFPX (6.07B). LAFPX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFPX (1.40) vs RMFCX (1.31). LAFPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFPX (28 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) and LAFPX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . LAFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. LAFPX (8.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. LAFPX (56.49).
| LAFPX | RMFCX | LAFPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.91 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.91 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.420 | 6.021 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.07B | 107B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.31 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.14 | 8.70 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.68 | 28.43 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.49 | 59.85 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.91 | 69.75 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement