Ad is loading...
LAFQX vs RMFCX
LAFQX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFQX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R2
Price$18.88
Change+$0.14 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.94B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.95
Change+$0.18 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.3B
LAFQX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFQX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFQX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. LAFQX (5.94B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFQX: RMFCX (1.34) vs LAFQX (1.26). LAFQX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFQX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAFQX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAFQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFQX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.53 vs. LAFQX (3.30). LAFQX return over 5 years is better than : 80.12 vs. RMFCX (76.10).
| LAFQX | RMFCX | LAFQX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.91 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.91 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.551 | 2.814 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.94B | 102B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.34 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.30 | 6.53 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.78 | 11.52 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.12 | 76.10 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.02 | 65.70 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...