Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFQX vs RMFCX
LAFQX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFQX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R2
Price$20.65
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
LAFQX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFQX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFQX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAFQX (6.24B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFQX: RMFCX (1.21) vs LAFQX (1.03). LAFQX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFQX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAFQX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAFQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFQX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. LAFQX (2.45). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. LAFQX (46.68).
| LAFQX | RMFCX | LAFQX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.91 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.91 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.865 | 12.783 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 110B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.21 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.45 | 6.00 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.78 | 27.94 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.68 | 52.67 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.94 | 84.73 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers