Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFQX vs RMFCX
LAFQX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFQX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R2
Price$20.91
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.4B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.20
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
LAFQX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFQX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFQX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAFQX (6.4B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFQX: RMFCX (1.20) vs LAFQX (1.02). LAFQX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFQX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAFQX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAFQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFQX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAFQX (7.70) and RMFCX (7.44) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.80 vs. LAFQX (56.86).
| LAFQX | RMFCX | LAFQX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.91 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.91 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.589 | 14.964 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.4B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.20 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.70 | 7.44 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.89 | 43.84 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.86 | 60.80 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.74 | 94.21 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement