Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFQX vs RMFEX
LAFQX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFQX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R2
Price$19.44
Change+$0.13 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.03B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$58.02
Change+$0.32 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
LAFQX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFQX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFQX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LAFQX (6.03B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFQX: RMFEX (1.58) vs LAFQX (1.23). LAFQX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFQX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFQX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFQX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.37 vs. LAFQX (7.31). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 54.01 vs. LAFQX (44.35).
| LAFQX | RMFEX | LAFQX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.62 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.62 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.609 | 6.053 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.03B | 105B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.58 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.31 | 9.37 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.90 | 18.90 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.35 | 54.01 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.92 | 77.06 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement