Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFQX vs RMFEX
LAFQX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFQX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R2
Price$20.73
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.36B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.62
Change-$0.04 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LAFQX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFQX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFQX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFQX (6.36B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFQX: RMFEX (1.49) vs LAFQX (1.09). LAFQX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFQX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFQX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFQX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LAFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.76 vs. RMFEX (7.10). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 61.31 vs. LAFQX (56.16).
| LAFQX | RMFEX | LAFQX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.62 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.62 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.519 | 13.050 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.36B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.49 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.76 | 7.10 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.68 | 35.20 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.16 | 61.31 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.29 | 103.92 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement