Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFTX vs RMFCX
LAFTX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFTX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R5
Price$19.35
Change-$0.19 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.01B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
LAFTX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFTX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFTX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LAFTX (6.01B). LAFTX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFTX (1.81) vs RMFCX (1.31). LAFTX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFTX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFTX (0.44). LAFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFTX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. LAFTX (7.61). RMFCX (59.85) and LAFTX (57.29) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFTX | RMFCX | LAFTX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.91 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.91 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.591 | 6.021 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.01B | 106B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 1.31 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.61 | 8.70 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.79 | 28.43 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.29 | 59.85 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement