Ad is loading...
LAFTX vs RMFCX
LAFTX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFTX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R5
Price$17.90
Change+$0.31 (+1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.53B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.96
Change+$0.76 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
LAFTX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFTX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFTX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. LAFTX (5.54B). LAFTX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFTX (1.86) vs RMFCX (1.34). LAFTX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFTX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFTX (0.45). LAFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFTX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. LAFTX (-1.97). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.32 vs. LAFTX (50.34).
| LAFTX | RMFCX | LAFTX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.831 | -2.681 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.54B | 95.8B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.34 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.97 | 1.87 | -105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.38 | 6.27 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.34 | 53.32 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...