Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFVX vs RMFEX
LAFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFVX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R6
Price$19.95
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.13B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.66
Change+$0.26 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.17B
LAFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFVX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. LAFVX (6.13B). LAFVX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: LAFVX (1.67) vs RMFEX (1.53). LAFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFVX (10 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than LAFVX (0.39). LAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFVX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.17 vs. LAFVX (5.52). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 59.19 vs. LAFVX (55.96).
| LAFVX | RMFEX | LAFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.62 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.62 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.445 | 9.454 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.13B | 108B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.53 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.52 | 8.17 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.45 | 31.60 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.96 | 59.19 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.14 | 82.54 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement