Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFYX vs RMFCX
LAFYX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFYX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated I
Price$19.52
Change+$0.13 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.03B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
LAFYX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFYX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFYX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LAFYX (6.03B). LAFYX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFYX (1.81) vs RMFCX (1.31). LAFYX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFYX (27 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFYX (0.44). LAFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFYX: RMFCX (250) vs LAFYX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. LAFYX (8.01). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.66 vs. LAFYX (47.26).
| LAFYX | RMFCX | LAFYX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.91 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.91 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.916 | 5.919 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.03B | 105B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 1.31 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.01 | 9.01 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.57 | 17.82 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.26 | 51.66 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.74 | 70.47 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement