Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFYX vs RMFCX
LAFYX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFYX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated I
Price$20.50
Change-$0.05 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.27B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.44
Change-$0.13 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
LAFYX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFYX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFYX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAFYX (6.27B). LAFYX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFYX (1.67) vs RMFCX (1.26). LAFYX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFYX (27 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFYX (0.44). LAFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFYX: RMFCX (250) vs LAFYX (1000000). LAFYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.20 vs. RMFCX (6.57). LAFYX (54.09) and RMFCX (53.88) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFYX | RMFCX | LAFYX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.91 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.91 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.524 | 11.403 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.27B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.26 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.20 | 6.57 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.87 | 30.34 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.09 | 53.88 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.18 | 96.02 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers