Ad is loading...
LAFYX vs RMFCX
LAFYX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFYX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated I
Price$17.95
Change+$0.17 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.59B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.01
Change+$0.55 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.25B
LAFYX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFYX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFYX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.2B vs. LAFYX (5.59B). LAFYX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFYX (1.86) vs RMFCX (1.34). LAFYX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFYX (27 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFYX (0.45). LAFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFYX: RMFCX (250) vs LAFYX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.37 vs. LAFYX (-0.03). LAFYX return over 5 years is better than : 54.45 vs. RMFCX (50.63).
| LAFYX | RMFCX | LAFYX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.712 | -3.599 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.59B | 96.2B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.34 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.03 | 1.37 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.53 | 7.19 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.45 | 50.63 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.19 | 51.64 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...