Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFYX vs RMFCX
LAFYX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFYX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated I
Price$20.90
Change+$0.05 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.36B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.20
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LAFYX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFYX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFYX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFYX (6.36B). LAFYX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFYX (1.63) vs RMFCX (1.24). LAFYX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFYX (28 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFYX (0.44). LAFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFYX: RMFCX (250) vs LAFYX (1000000). LAFYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.67 vs. RMFCX (7.56). LAFYX (60.98) and RMFCX (60.44) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFYX | RMFCX | LAFYX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.91 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.91 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.137 | 13.116 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.36B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.24 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.67 | 7.56 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.98 | 33.69 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.98 | 60.44 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.62 | 96.24 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers