Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFYX vs RMFCX
LAFYX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFYX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated I
Price$20.73
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
LAFYX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFYX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFYX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAFYX (6.24B). LAFYX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFYX (1.58) vs RMFCX (1.21). LAFYX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFYX (28 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFYX (0.44). LAFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFYX: RMFCX (250) vs LAFYX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. LAFYX (3.07). RMFCX (52.67) and LAFYX (50.15) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFYX | RMFCX | LAFYX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.91 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.91 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.481 | 12.783 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 110B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.21 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.07 | 6.00 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.93 | 27.94 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.15 | 52.67 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.11 | 84.73 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers