Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFYX vs RMFEX
LAFYX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFYX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated I
Price$20.66
Change-$0.04 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.26B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.33
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.19B
LAFYX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFYX vs. RMFEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFYX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAFYX (6.26B). LAFYX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: LAFYX (1.58) vs RMFEX (1.46). LAFYX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFYX (28 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than LAFYX (0.44). LAFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFYX: RMFEX (250) vs LAFYX (1000000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.93 vs. LAFYX (3.02). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 54.19 vs. LAFYX (49.73).
| LAFYX | RMFEX | LAFYX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.62 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.62 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.697 | 12.910 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.26B | 110B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.46 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.02 | 5.93 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.19 | 28.94 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.73 | 54.19 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.41 | 91.83 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement