Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAGVX vs PBDPX
LAGVX vs PBDPX Comparison
Open Charts LAGVX vs PBDPX
Lord Abbett Income A
Price$2.48
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.73B
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond I-2
Price$9.22
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.45B
LAGVX vs PBDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAGVX vs. PBDPX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAGVX is a Hold and PBDPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBDPX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. LAGVX (5.73B). LAGVX pays higher dividends than PBDPX: LAGVX (5.47) vs PBDPX (4.51). LAGVX was incepted earlier than PBDPX: LAGVX (44 years) vs PBDPX (17 years). PBDPX (1.05) is less costly to investors than LAGVX (0.71). PBDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 270.00 vs. LAGVX (190.00). LAGVX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBDPX: LAGVX (1500) vs PBDPX (1000000). PBDPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.55 vs. LAGVX (3.99). LAGVX return over 5 years is better than : 4.68 vs. PBDPX (0.84).
| LAGVX | PBDPX | LAGVX / PBDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.05 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.05 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.805 | 7.204 | 94% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.73B | 12.5B | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.47 | 4.51 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.99 | 4.55 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.99 | 18.78 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.68 | 0.84 | 556% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.63 | 32.37 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers