Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAGWX vs WCMNX
LAGWX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts LAGWX vs WCMNX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth A
Price$25.75
Change+$0.29 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.09B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.69
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.16M
LAGWX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAGWX vs. WCMNX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAGWX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAGWX has more cash in the bank: 2.09B vs. WCMNX (44.2M). LAGWX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: LAGWX (0.02) vs WCMNX (0.00). LAGWX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: LAGWX (52 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than LAGWX (0.94). LAGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). LAGWX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LAGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.45 vs. WCMNX (4.66). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 14.56 vs. LAGWX (-10.49).
| LAGWX | WCMNX | LAGWX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.24 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.04 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.610 | 7.880 | 173% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.09B | 44.2M | 4,722% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.45 | 4.66 | 310% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.45 | 35.54 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.49 | 14.56 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement