Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAGWX vs WCMNX
LAGWX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts LAGWX vs WCMNX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth A
Price$25.07
Change+$0.13 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.1B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.62
Change+$0.14 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.71M
LAGWX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAGWX vs. WCMNX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAGWX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAGWX has more cash in the bank: 2.1B vs. WCMNX (44.7M). LAGWX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: LAGWX (0.02) vs WCMNX (0.00). LAGWX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: LAGWX (52 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than LAGWX (0.94). LAGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). LAGWX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LAGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.19 vs. WCMNX (5.39). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 18.56 vs. LAGWX (-3.16).
| LAGWX | WCMNX | LAGWX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.24 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.04 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.290 | 6.225 | 181% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.1B | 44.7M | 4,694% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.19 | 5.39 | 300% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.36 | 27.17 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.16 | 18.56 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement