Ad is loading...
LAGWX vs WCMNX
LAGWX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts LAGWX vs WCMNX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth A
Price$17.85
Change-$1.08 (-5.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.78B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$10.66
Change-$0.85 (-7.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.58M
LAGWX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAGWX vs. WCMNX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAGWX is a Hold and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAGWX has more cash in the bank: 1.78B vs. WCMNX (41.6M). LAGWX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: LAGWX (0.03) vs WCMNX (0.00). LAGWX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: LAGWX (52 years) vs WCMNX (5 years). WCMNX (2.11) is less costly to investors than LAGWX (0.94). LAGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMNX (48.00). LAGWX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LAGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.40 vs. WCMNX (-10.22). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 60.98 vs. LAGWX (25.73).
| LAGWX | WCMNX | LAGWX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.24 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.11 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.529 | -9.299 | 167% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.78B | 41.6M | 4,269% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.40 | -10.22 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.42 | -7.10 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.73 | 60.98 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.01 | N/A | - |